Sunday, February 23, 2025

The Beginning of Stanfield's 

Union Suits for Generations of Canadians and Many Others, including any number of U.S. Citizens.

So many of you Union Suit Fans viewers swear by Stanfield's Union Suits, that I contacted the famous long underwear manufacturing firm asking if I might use their story to pass along to you. It's found on Stanfield's web-site. An executive assistant was happy to hear from me. She encouraged me to use their published history as the story is a good one! 

I've featured Standfield's underwear in a number of postings including my blog readers, workers in their factory, models, and even the mayor of Truro ice-skating in his red union suit! It's a town who probably enjoy's wearing their underwear more than any other one I know of.  So, here it is straight from Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada. Happy wearing....

Charles E. Stanfield had no idea when he immigrated to Canada in 1855 that he would found the firm that would become recognized as Canada's leading manufacturer of men's underwear. In the beginning, Charles, along with his brother-in-law, Samuel E. Dawson, founded the Tryon Woolen Mills in Tryon, P.E.I. in 1856. Ten years later he sold his interests to Samuel and moved to Nova Scotia. In 1870 he founded the Truro Woolen Mills, which at that time was located on Brunswick Street. It was believed to be the first factory of its kind in Canada. 

Tryon Woolen Mills, Tryon, PEI - 1856
Tryon Woolen Mills, Tryon, Prince Edward Island - 1856

During this period, Charles was constantly looking to expand the operation. He purchased other mills around eastern Canada, including the Carding Mill in St. Croix, NS (1872) which he renamed the Ste. Croix Wool Factory. After a few years, Charles and family sold the Ste. Croix mill to Alxander Dunbar and returned to Truro to focus there. This marked the official renaming to the Stanfield Mill.

As the company grew, the factory was relocated from Brunswick Street to its current location on the south bank of the Salmon River (Logan Street) in 1882. These important events would be crucial to setting the company up for success in the coming decades and century.  

Stanfield’s annual stag picnic. August 17, 1935
Stanfield’s annual stag picnic. August 17, 1935

Building A Brand

Charles was a creative genius. He maintained a workshop in a barn behind his house where he spent the majority of his time creating new equipment and products.He developed and manufactured the first cardigan jackets and stockinettes in Canada. He introduced Canadians to heavy rib underwear and the famous “Drop Seat.” He also manufactured sweater cloth and knitting yarn.

In 1896, Charles sold his business to his two sons, John and Frank Stanfield who had their own vision for the company’s future. They believed the way to build a reputation was to build a stable product line in one specific field, despite their father’s advisement otherwise. They chose to specialize in knitted merchandise and renamed the company the Truro Knitting Mills Limited, accordingly. It was a good decision.

Illustrated historic advertisement for unshrinkable underwear

We Are Unshrinkable

Together, John and Frank developed the famous “Shrink-proof Process” which catapulted the little Truro underwear company to fame.

The Klondike Gold Rush of 1897 provided them with their first big break where some 100,000 people, spurred by rumors of gold, made their way north to the harsh terrain of the Yukon. The Stanfield’s “Unshrinkable” Underwear was pivotal to the would-be-prospectors and miners who could find no substitute for the warm, heavy, woolly underwear.

Stanfield’s Limited went on to incorporate in 1906. During World War 1, they manufactured wool blankets, knitting yarn and cloth that provided a major impetus for the expansion of the Firm. After the war, John Stanfield was appointed to the Senate.

Table sculpture of the Stanfield's Unshrinkable Underwear advertising
Black and white photo of a billboard

The Building Block

The early 1920’s marked a turning point when a peroxide process was developed to bleach underwear, opposed to the sulphur process that left a distinct odour behind.

Stanfield’s also began carbonizing wool, a process that produced a much softer fabric. The late twenties saw the first line of cotton combinations and the use of synthetic rayon was used to produce ladies’ undergarments.

Stanfield’s entered the undershirt and brief field in the late thirties, two-piece winter underwear in the forties, and Thermal underwear in the fifties. The latter two gradually took over the winter underwear market, providing the building blocks for the company’s product growth over the many years to follow. Stanfield’s is also responsible for popularizing the T-shirt in Canada as well as men’s Polo Pyjamas.

Historical newspaper ad for unshrinkable underwear
Historic photograph of the inside of the Stanfield's factory
Stanfield’s factory production

An Industry Leader

Today, Stanfield’s is a leader in its field, taking pride in its products and ability to adapt and stay ahead of consumer market needs and wants.

Whether it be introducing new fabrics, blends or styles, we’ve always stood by our basic policy of “the best product at reasonable prices,” and will continue to do so as we move forward. Fashion forward, technologically advanced, and when possible the majority of its products will be made in Canada. Stanfield’s is a specialist in underwear products and has rightfully earned its reputation as ‘the Underwear Company!"

Photo of an elastic waistband with the Stanfield's name 


8 comments:

  1. Thank you for the history of Stanfield's underwear. I have known about them for many years, but haven't seen their products in the USA where I live. I have ordered some of their products a couple times on line. I will say they do wear like iron. I still have a pair of bottoms that is probably very close to 28 years old and feel better every time I put them on. I have tried their two piece and combination or union suit as well. The only thing I wish they would do is make them in a tall size. I can find the bottoms in tall (they fit me perfect) but the tops and union suits are only in regular sizes, which make the sleeves a bit short for me. They do make a very fine product. michael1538@aol.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the history of Stanfield. How appropriate was it that as I read the post I was lounging in my recliner wearing “Uncle Ubb’s” grey Stanfield Union suit. I agree they make a long wearing and high quality product. That particular union suit is at least 5 years old and shows no signs of wear. The only issue I have with it is that the sleeves are a little too short. I like my union suit sleeves to go right to my wrists and these are about 2 inches too short. Otherwise it is a very nice union suit…..Buckeye Mike

    ReplyDelete
  3. Chris: I have not had the issues of the above men in Stanfield union suits. I have a couple. They are pricey but worth it because they last years longer than other union suits I have. But I am a smaller size man and the medium suits fit me well. Larger men may have some issues. Thanks for posting their history, a great Canadian long underwear company!
    ....Tyler, Tulsa, OK

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for the history lesson on Stanfield's, Chris. I love the vintage ads . Interestingly, on their website, Stanfield's lists union suits not as "combinations" but as "onesies"! I purchased one through The Vermont Country Store more than 20 years ago. It was a cotton wool mix and I finally wore it out last year.----- Retro Jeff in Illinois

    ReplyDelete
  5. Stanfield red union suits. are great nice and warm on those cold Canadian days.

    ReplyDelete
  6. They used to sell a short sleeve long unionsuit that I wish they or someone still offered

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree with you on the short sleeve union suit. I might add that lighter weight union suits in general is something I wish were still available as well as athletic unions. Buckeye Mike

    ReplyDelete
  8. I have 3 athletic short unionsuits w the button shoulder but will be sad when they finally wear out

    ReplyDelete